John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil Co. and as a result was the richest person on the planet when he died in 1937. Yet some of his 200-plus living descendants have embarked on a mission to challenge Standard Oil offspring Exxon Mobil Corp. on climate change.
So it should come as little surprise that the investment company that traces its roots to John D.’s family office is contending with a related question: deciding just how much it wants to change the world.
In March, Rockefeller & Co. transformed into Rockefeller Capital Managementfollowing a transaction led by former Morgan Stanley wealth management chief Greg Fleming, with financing from hedge fund Viking Global Investors. The rechristened company, with Fleming as chief executive officer, is owned by its management, Viking, and a trust representing the Rockefeller family.
Fleming’s plans for the company, which had $12.7 billion in assets under management at the end of 2017, include bulking up its asset management effort, starting a strategic advisory operation, and expanding its wealth management arm, which provides advice and planning for wealthy clients. Part of that effort involves catering to women and millennials with socially responsible investing products.
For Fleming, whose 30-year Wall Street career included a stint as president of Merrill Lynch & Co., such environmental, social, and governance-based offerings are integral to winning clients. “The millennials are actually going to treat ESG investing as something that’s important to them forever,” he says.
In a 32-page January report discussing the performance of its sustainability and impact analysts last year, the company said it voted 2,696 proxies and supported 46 percent of shareholder proposals, including two it co-filed. Among the steps it took to engage with companies it invested in, Rockefeller voted against an entire board slate for the first time because of “corporate responsibility shortcomings.” In the report, the company said it was “dissatisfied” that Oracle Corp.’s board hadn’t made more progress in aligning CEO compensation with long-term performance. It said it will continue to engage with Amazon.com Inc. on human capital management, particularly regarding working conditions at its distribution centers.
Still, Rockefeller Capital’s chief investment officer, David Harris, says the company will go only so far. It doesn’t want to rail against a company’s management in the press, for one thing. “The beauty of being in public equities is that we can exit the position,” he says.
Responsible investing in public markets was long considered by many financial professionals to be an underperforming niche. Managers screened out businesses that investors disapprove of—tobacco makers or oil companies—and clients accepted that investing in this manner was likely to curb returns.
More recently, however, many investors have come to believe that socially responsible investing doesn’t necessarily forgo gains—and in addition, that such stock holdings can create an avenue to making companies behave better. Earlier this year, BlackRock Inc. CEO Laurence Fink wrote an open letter to chief executives urging them to measure their success beyond earnings. Among his suggestions was that CEOs evaluate their companies’ impact on the environment or the communities they serve. In the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Florida that killed 17 people, BlackRock and State Street Corp. said they would engage with gunmakers.
To get a large public company to pay attention typically requires one of two things: deep pockets or a loud voice. The vast majority of shareholder proposals seeking to improve a company’s environmental or social impact are still put forward and supported either by large pension funds, such as the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or by nonprofit activists, such as the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia. Several small companies that manage money for wealthy individuals, foundations, and endowments—including Zevin Asset Management, Arjuna Capital, and Trillium Asset Management—fall into the activist camp, but they control a small fraction of the alternative investment industry. Otherwise, money controlled by rich people has rarely been used to push for corporate responsibility.
So should private wealth embrace shareholder engagement and even shareholder activism? Why are few foundations or billionaires with strong values using their public stockholdings to push for change?
Such questions are drawing the attention of wealthy people and family foundations across the country, particularly after the Ford Foundation announced last year that it would devote up to $1 billion of its $12 billion portfolio to investments that would make the endowment money while also advancing its social justice mission.
Meredith Shields, managing director of the Sorenson Impact Foundation, says Ford’s decision was part of what pushed Jim Sorenson, founder of Sorenson Communications LLC, to reconsider how he was investing the publicly traded funds that endow his foundation. After a yearlong discussion, the foundation shifted a quarter of its publicly traded investments into socially responsible strategies at the end of last year. Shields says this was the first move in a two-year process conducted in conjunction with the foundation’s financial adviser, Sepio Capital LLC.